root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > > So, I suspect we have to make a list of people for whom either SF or | > > Google SVN works and decide where we go from there. | > > | > | > For me SF SVN works. I did only tiny commits and one of them failed | > (I had to redo it), so I am not sure how well will scale. Getting | > sources was slow, but updates are fast enough. | | well, in that sense, SVN "works" for me too. a full checkout involves | a checkout command followed by a minimum of 9 update commands to get | the missing files and a commit requires several tries.
I have a checkout a long time ago on my laptop -- and several on other machines. Update always take only one try, same for commit. And I believe I have been committing to Axiom repo very often. I commit to Axiom repo from three machines, they all "just work". [...] | source code control systems should be as reliable, simple, and as | fast as using a cash machine. SVN feels like trying to arrange | an international bank loan for $20. :-) :-) -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
