C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | > [...] | > | > | I have always thought that if we are making Axiom into literate | > | documents, they should read as such - if I am looking for the pamphlet | > | that describes the SPAD compiler I am interested in what it IS doing and | > | what it is intended to do and why, not what it did in the past before it | > | was fixed. | > | > This type of stance is appropriate for trunk. My experience with | > workind on branches tells me that it creates troubles when it comes to | > merge do merges. But, hey the system is already largely | > non-documented, so why not continue that way? | | Experience trumps ideas ;-),
and with no experience, no ideas. [...] | I think we should make the decision as a project not to wait any longer | for Aldor, I don't know for you, but I'm not waiting for Aldor. I've decided a long time ago to go with SPAD and improve it. I think I've sid that many times. But, yes, the project has to decide. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
