Vanuxem Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Le dimanche 26 novembre 2006 à 21:37 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit : | > "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | On November 26, 2006 2:58 PM Vanuxem Gregory wrote: | > | > ... | > | > > On November 26, 2006 10:06 AM Gaby asked: | > | > > > | > | > > > What happens if you just say: | > | > > > | > | > > > )lisp (boottran::boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot") | > | > > > | > | > > > ? | > | > > > | > | > > | > | > > Hmmm... | > | > > | > | > > (1) -> )lisp (boottran::boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot") | > | > > | > | > > >> System error: | > | > > The function BOOTTRAN::BOOT is undefined. | > | > | > | > I think Gaby wanted to say: | > | > | > | > )lisp (boot "src/interp/i-output2.boot") | > | > | > | | > | So why not just say what it is supposed to do instead of | > | making me "experiment"? <sigh> | > | > ??? | > | > I did mean boottran::boot, as I intended boot from package boottran | > which is documented (src/boot/ptyout.boot) as | > | > -- (boot "filename") translates the file "filename.boot" to | > -- the common lisp file "filename.clisp", compiles it and loads | > -- the bbin/o file. | | Sorry. I see now.
Don't be sorry. Apparently, I made the incorrect assumption that Bill was more knowledgeable with the system than he thinks he is. That exceedingly annoyed him. Please ignore my message. -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
