--- Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | There are, already, a lot of versions of Axiom (gold, silver, > | build-improvements, wh-sandbox...), I do not want to add yet > | another one. Don't know how this has to be handled. > > The more the merrier.
At this point, I'd say with everyone exploring and testing at a very basic level the only thing to do is to keep a list as best we can. Eventually things will probably come together as the best solutions appear, but for a while it's going to be a bit crazy. The requirement to document code in a literate fashion means the hurdle to get code in the main tree is high, and that means a lot of experimental branches will spring up as people do "not ready for prime time" work. In some ways this might actually keep people from assuming Axiom is ready for uses it isn't really ready for, so it's not all bad. Cheers, CY P.S. - is http://weitz.de/cl-fad/ of interest for the path issues? For sockets http://common-lisp.net/project/usocket/ might be of interest. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091 _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer