William, Thanks for adding your comments to the wiki. I have re-arranged this a little by separating the comments about segment from those about functions so that now your comments about segments appears here:
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandBoxFloatSegment On June 7, 2007 9:21 PM William Sit wrote: > ... > I am overwhelmed by the amount of Axiom emails and most > I could not follow. I don't even have the guts to try > compiling the newest versions. To me, it is very > confusing, but it does seem that Axiom is in excellent > hands. > Jump in any time, your contributions are like a "breath of fresh air" ;-) Perhaps the multiple versions are a bit confusing but so far there seems to be a reasonable amount of co-operation so I think things are proceeding very much as one would expect/hope in open source development. > I'm looking forward to your comments on Segment. It > just feels strange that the implementation is so > "uncategorical". > I added a slightly changed version of Segment to this page: http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandBoxFloatSegment All I did was require that Segment be defined over a Ring and then re-iterpreted BY as specifying the separation of elements of the segment. This seems more "categorical" to me given what I expect to be the normal use-case although it is in some ways more restrictive than the original as you pointed out in your email. Can you imagine an actual application where it is interesting to define a segment over something that is not a Ring? Regards, Bill Page. _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
