"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think it is a good idea but that it need not be a high priority.
I agree as well. If I worked in that direction it would be a side project which would get my attention only on occasion. > Perhaps related but much more important to me would be a general > cleanup of the output of the SPAD compiler. Right now it might be at > best said to be "spectacularly obscure". (I recall Gaby quoting one of > his students who shared this view of the SPAD output and error > messages.). It seems to me that the current diagnostic output was > intended to be intelligible only to someone who was familiar with the > internal design of the SPAD compiler. Surely it is possible to produce > compiler output that makes sense to someone who only programs at the > SPAD level. I wish I had the motivation to do the work and refit the current compiler with a proper error facility. This is just another thing I hope to solve `for free' as a consequence of the Lisp rewrite. Take care, Steve _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
