Tim, I am truly shocked and saddened by your demand to remove my updates concerning the FriCAS project from the axiom-developer server. !!! :-(( ?
But you are paying the bills for the entire axiom-developer.org server so I have complied with your request. To me this clearly demonstrates that an open source project (like Axiom used to be) should *never* allow themselves to get into a situation where significant project resources are controlled by only one individual. Never - even if you once strongly believed in that person's good intentions. So now what are you intentions? Are you really trying to alienate everyone involved in the project? I asked you a few weeks ago: "Do you have any idea how much damage you are causing?". I guess that question still stands. I really thought you had recovered from the state that lead to the current acrimonious situation and so we could just move on. Sigh. But now you have even *me* feeling like some of our other colleagues who have already announced their resignation from the project. I feel like I have been trying hard to do some damage control and keep the Axiom project together but you have just stabbed me in the back! I believe that describing FricCAS the way I just attempted to do - in the same way that we have previously described and supported Reduce, Maxima, SymPy and Sage is not the same thing as promoting it - certainly not any more than promoting progress in computer algebra systems in general. I just cannot understand what you are thinking... Under these circumstances I do not think I can continue to help maintain the Axiom website on the axiom-developer server any more, at least not until some very basic problems are resolved here. This makes me very sad not only because I have put a lot of effort into it over the last 4 years but also because I think it is still a very important way of promoting Axiom and I still want Axiom to look good even if I can not agree with you about how this should be done. Fortunately there are still some other Axiom developers who have not yet resigned and who have manager-level access to this web site so I am fairly sure you can get by with their help. I am not optimistic that any kind of "vote" out of this sitation is possible. As the book quote points out, democracy is only likely to happen in a mature well-populated project that has already sorted out most of these differences. Right now we are lucky if we can even find 5 out out of the nearly 100 subscribers in the axiom-devel mailing list who are willing to make a public statement about any of issues that have been considered for vote-taking here recently. I get the feeling either everyone is watching and waiting to see what happens next, or else (maybe) very few people really care that much and they really aren't watching at all. So here we are. This is certainly not the kind of situation I thought we would be in next time we met in person . (I presume you are still planning to attend the ISSAC conference?) I thought I would be buying you a beer - or maybe even a 4-course gourmet meal to celebrate - not arguing and biting nails. It's Damn disappointing :-( but by the way, my invitation to dinner next week still stands. Bill Page. On 7/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill, I see that you've decided to update the pages <http://wiki.axiomm-developer.org/AxiomCommunity> to include the fricas project. We discussed this issue previously on the mailing list. I suggest that you read the section: <http://producingoss.com/html-chunk/forks.html> from which I quote: "If those initiating the fork feel that they are sprouting a new branch off the main project, the perception question is resolved immediately and easily. Everyone, both developers and users, will treat the fork as a new project, with a new name (perhaps based on the old name, but easily distinguishable from it), a separate website, and a separate philosophy or goal." I strongly object to the dilution of the Axiom name and resources implied by your action. A fork implies the decision NOT to share resources. Please do NOT promote Fricas as Axiom in any forum. They are two entirely separate projects. We clearly disagree on this point. Until we have a mechanism for voting in place, and a vote is taken that results in community discussion and agreement that Fricas should be promoted as you have done, I ask you to remove your edits. Tim
_______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
