On 7/31/07, C Y wrote: > --- Bill Page wrote: > ... > > > > I dont know anything about Intellectual property laws in the US but > > isnt "Axiom" too common a word to qualify as a trademark? > > The fact that NAG DID have it registered as a trademark when it was a > commercial product would seem to be conclusive proof that it is not too > common to qualify. Many other "common" words act as trademarks - have > a look in the uspto's trademark search engine. >
Actually isn't the Axiom "trademark" the logo with the character i having both an upper and lower dot? (See http://wiki.axiom-developer.org ) Maybe that is what makes it sufficiently unique? Regards, Bill Page _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
