"M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

| > Suppose someone creates a
| > closed, commercial, really fast Groebner basis algorithm, does not
| > publish the details, and then the code dies. It can happen. Macsyma
| > had some of the best algorithms and they are lost.
| 
| 1. What do you think the real chances are of a "really fast Groebner
| basis algorithm" are? I'm by no means an expert, but I thought the
| computational complexity odds were heavily stacked against one.

Indeed.  There is an inherent complexity issue.  So what people do is
to optimize for certain classes of systems.  So, I don't know what
"really fast Groebner basis algorithm" could possibly mean.

-- Gaby


_______________________________________________
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer

Reply via email to