On 10 Dec 2007 08:25:00 +0100, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (2) jsmath looks identical to tex, since it is 100% implementation of the > > tex layout engine. > > I do not think that the latter is true.
I should clarify what I meant -- it is an implementation of the TeX *Equation* layout engine, not the text part -- it's only for formulas. > However, what I know is, that it uses > the TeX fonts. It does allow one to use computer modern fonts (120K) if available; otherwise it uses unicode. It can also use server-side bitmaped fonts. > On the other hand, there is tex4ht, which is capable of producing html > specially prepared for jsmath rendering. That sounds cool and potentially very useful in order to attempt to avoid latex2html. > I used it to demonstrate that Axioms current documentation (which is written > in > a subset/variant of LaTeX) can be brought to the browser directly. As far as > I > know, Tim et al. rewrote the documentation into html by hand. -- William _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer