I must say that I'm impressed with this. >> There is a technology called d3.js that looks especially interesting: >> https://github.com/mbostock/d3/wiki/Gallery and I have spent a little >> time looking at it. It is data driven so Axiom can feed it data just >> like it does for the current graphics. A websocket connection would >> allow two-way interaction with Axiom. >Leaving aside technicalities I think that >http://www.math.wm.edu/~leemis/chart/UDR/UDR.html >is an illustration of an effective way to organize some mathematical >structures/relationships. So far as I can see there is no reason calls >(or code) couldn't be automatically generated from an illustration like >this. The background explanations (obtained by clicking) could be >expanded or linked to code. IMHO it's not complete but an excellent >start for people trying to model statistical data. For instance draging >and dropping particular distributions into an "analyser" for >comparisons, etc..., is a logical extension. >Of course the missing ingredient is an abstraction direction allowing >focusing on particular properties; say different ranges, data types, and >so forth. But those ideas are rendered obvious once the "style" is visible.
I'd like to develop a similar diagram for Axiom categories listing all of the axioms that underpin each category. The links would go to the section of the book for that category. I already have an SVG graph of the categories, domains, and packages on the Axiom website. Tim _______________________________________________ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
