IMHO, cvs is directly used by developers with some understanding - hence they will be capable enough to generate the sources using WSDL - despite that fact that we assume they got to have Java and Axis Java on the system.
For release packages, both binary and source, lets package the generated source only for samples. This will help those users who do not have Java to try out Axis C++ just with the samples. Thoughts please! Thanks, Samisa... On 12 Jan 2005 18:38:12 +0600, Roshan Weerasuriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi All, > > In my openion I think for the Samples it is better to keep the generated > code in the CVS, as the name itself implies that these are samples, so > there should be the sample codes/source_files to the user. (It is > certainly true that a user can generate these through the tool, but we > need to make the life simple for any kind of first time user of Axis C++ > so that he will be encouraged to use Axis C++) We have to retain the > first time users of Axis C++, and we auctualy should let them feel that > Axis C++ is not much of a burden to be used. > > Roshan > > On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 16:43, Damitha Kumarage wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:22:19 +0600, sanjaya singharage wrote > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Adrian Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:50 PM > > > Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit: > > > ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "sanjaya singharage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/01/2005 > > > 09:34:14: > > > > > > > > > For a release of course we can proivde the source for the samples > > > > generated > > > > > with the tool of that release. Otherwise I guess we will making new > > > > > uses > > > > > life more difficult. > > > > > > > > True, but they're going to need to generate the stubs for themselves at > > > > some point. Doing this as part of the samples seems a natural part of > > > > the > > > > education. (particularly as we'll be confident of these working first > > > time > > > > and everytime) > > > > > > > > > > Yes I think you have a point. As you say generating code should be a > > > "natural part". Agreed. > > > > FYI > > I have seen some guru saying somewhere that "when testing with an > > application > > for usability in the first few minutes if you cannot make a sample running > > successfully then stop cosidering it as an option." I don't know how true > > this > > is. But it has some thing in it. Shall we get some burden of it in our > > deployment process and let new user have some relief. Of cousre he will > > generated the stuff and go deeper in the next step > > > > thanks > > damitha > > > > > > > > > > sanjaya. > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Adrian Dick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <axis-c-dev@ws.apache.org> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 3:21 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Removing generetd source from cvs [was:Re: cvs commit: > > > > > ws-axis/c/tests/client/interop/round1/gen_src SimpleTestSoap.cpp] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My opinion is that we should also remove them from samples, > > > > > > certainly > > > > in > > > > > > CVS. Maybe we need to ensure the samples documentation has clear > > > > > > instructions for the users on generating stubs from the WSDL. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Damitha Kumarage > > hSenid Software International (PVT) Ltd(Web: www.hsenid.com) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > Lanka Software Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk) > > > > > >
