Hi Mark, Yeah sure, post the changes that you intend to make in the mailing list so that we may be able to help you whether your changes will fit in with our design or not.
BTW are attachments (server side) running on AIX? Rangika On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:34 +0100, Mark Whitlock wrote: > > > > Hi Rangika, > I will continue to investigate what I need over what support is already in > the code. I did not want to offend yourself or Damitha by implementing this > if he already part-way through implementing this himself. I am keen to > ensure that my changes fit in with your design so I will post to the > mailing list what changes I intend to make, so that I do not break the > server-side support. > Thanks, > Mark > Mark Whitlock > IBM > > ----- Forwarded by Mark Whitlock/UK/IBM on 17/05/2005 17:25 ----- > > Rangika Mendis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ce.lk> To > Apache AXIS C Developers > 17/05/2005 05:20 <[email protected]> > cc > > Please respond to Subject > "Apache AXIS C Re: Attachments > Developers List" > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > I'm not involved in attachment support client side.I was only involved > in server side.Damitha is working on client side I'm not sure how far > he has done.I think he wouldn't mind you working on it. > > Regds > Rangika > > On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 13:31 +0100, Mark Whitlock wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Damitha, Rangika, > > I am very interested in attachment support in the client. If possible, I > > would like to work with you on completing this. In particular I would > like > > doc-literal support - so if your current support is rpc-encoded, I could > > add in doc-literal support. > > > > I was expecting to see addAttachment methods on Stub and Call - is this > how > > you imagine it will work? > > Thank you for your help, > > Mark > > Mark Whitlock > > IBM > > > > > > >
