I have commited my initial changes to the CVS. The commit was done after running the test cycle.
I get the SOAP header tests failing, and I am looking into the problem. The reason to commit the changes early is that I need some help with SSL related testing as I haven't got the SSL tests up and running. Thanks, Samisa... On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:17, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > I am in the process of moving all Call::openConnection() logic into > the Call class constructor. > > So far I have been somewhat successful but some of the tests are > failing. > > However, it looks to me that Call::openConnection() should not be > there at all (Please see the sequence diagram that I sent earlier) and > as I have discussed earlier, at the moment this is called multiple > times for each method invocation. > > > > Once I get around the problems with moving Call::openConnection() to > constructor, I plan to reuse the ClientAxisEngine, MessageData, > SOAPSerializer and SOAPDeSerializer objects, instead of destroying > them on each method call. > > My feeling is that this will lead to improved performance, though I > have not yet planned how to measure it. > > > > Thanks, > > Samisa… > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:34 PM > To: Apache AXIS C Developers List > Subject: RE: Restructuring Call::initialize > > > > Yes, ClientAxisEengine is deleted for each method, despite the fact we > are using the same Stub object. > > > > Deleting the engine every time has to be removed and move some of the > init logic which is one off to the constructor. > > > > I have attached a sequence diagram herewith to help understanding > Call::initialize(). It looks to me that Call::initialize triggers a > deep set of method calls. Some activities like buffer clearing has to > be done every time before a fresh invoke. However, some activities > like setting the end point can be one off. > > > > Thanks, > > Samisa… > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sanjaya gayan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 4:01 PM > To: Apache AXIS C Developers List > Subject: Re: Restructuring Call::initialize > > > > It looks to me like with each call to Call::Initialize() if a > ClientAxisEngine object exists it is deleted and then a new one > created and initialized (I am not sure whether > ClientAxisEngine->Initialize() caters for this). > > > Shouldn't it be that if a AxisClient object exists it should be reused > by intializing and a new one created only if there is no AxisClient > object? > > > > > > I guess that the deleting of the existing object could be removed, in > which case initializing the ClientAxisEngine (which should "intialize" > all members of the ClientAxisEngine. not sure whether this is the > current behaviour) with each call to Call::Initialize has to be done. > > > > > > sanjaya. > > > Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > I am looking into the Call::initialize() method that is being > called within the client side generated code, > prior to each method invocation. > > Basically if we have 2 method calls that we could invoke, and > in the client program we execute both those methods, > we will be calling initialize() on the m_pCall member of the > stub object twice. > However, having a glance into Call::initialize() it looks to > me that some of the activities could be made one off > instead of executing them multiple times for each method > invocation. > > Some of the candidate calls that I want to make one off is > initing the AxisClientEngine once, thus reusing the > serializer and deserializer objects for multiple calls. > It would be helpful if one of the original designers of this > mechanism could rationalize the initial design so that > I would not miss any important points here. > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for > FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos -- Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Virtusa Corporation
