Only ws projects :)

-- dims

On 2/2/06, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry !
> I was not aware that when someone has commit on one apache project they have 
> it on them all !
>
>
>
>
>  Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 02/02/2006 18:54
>
> Please respond to
>  "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]>
>
>
> To Apache AXIS C Developers List <[email protected]>
>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject Re: guththila re-entrance
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No,no,no.....Please don't do that :)
>
>  You have commit privs. So please check them in.
>
>  thanks,
>  dims
>
>  On 2/2/06, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > Thanks Ed !
>  >
>  > An ordered sequence of patches would appear to be best solution for 
> tracking.
>  >  Keep 'em coming ;-)
>  >
>  > cheers,
>  > John.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Edward Slattery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >
>  > 31/01/2006 21:11
>  >
>  > Please respond to
>  >  "Apache AXIS C Developers List" <[email protected]>
>  >
>  >
>  > To [email protected]
>  >
>  > cc
>  >
>  >
>  > Subject Re: guththila re-entrance
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > OK, Im now on axis-c-dev. I found some difficulties in building patches, 
> so I have logged this and 3 other problems on JIRA with details of the 
> changes needed.
>  > I tried to attach patches, but was unable to attach files - some security 
> issue that I need to work out.
>  > I have two other fixes to apply yet, which are compiler warnings for 
> signed/unsigned etc. And one bad return value.
>  > Question about patches- suppose I want to provide patch files for all six 
> of my fixes - I guess I cant build one huge patch as that doesnt help you 
> decide what to apply - but I also cant apply patch after patch unless you 
> know the exact order to apply them - whats the protocol here?
>  > One big patch with comments showing which parts apply to which problem, or 
> an ordered sequence of patches?
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On 30/01/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Hi Ed,
>  >
>  >  This would be a *very* useful update! Please go ahead and patch it ...
>  >
>  >  BTW this discussion belongs in axis-c-dev and not here.
>  >
>  >  Thanks,
>  >
>  >  Sanjiva.
>  >
>  >  On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 14:27 +0000, Edward Slattery wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > I dont know where to log this one - anyone want to tell me if its a
>  >  > problem or I am doing something wrong?
>  >  >
>  >  > I am testing the Guththila parser, and have a WSDL which contains an
>  >  > <import> of an XSD.
>  >  >
>  >  > I have one single guththila environment, and create a new parser for
>  >  > each file encountered.
>  >  >
>  >  > Guththilla cannot handle that because guththila_event is global, and
>  >  > the inner parse fails because of handling the wrong event
>  >  > type (the GUTHTHILA_EMPTY_ELEMENT from the outer parse.)
>  >  >
>  >  > By putting the guththila_event inside the parser structure, and
>  >  > replacing every occurence (18 in all) of guththila_event with
>  >  > parser->guththila_event, I can successfully re-enter and parse nested
>  >  > files.
>  >  >
>  >  > Would that be a useful update?
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
>



--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/

Reply via email to