[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12563745#action_12563745
]
Bill Mitchell commented on AXIS2C-859:
--------------------------------------
Thanks for picking up this issue, Lahiru. I was thinking about starting to
look at it in detail myself.
Examining the patch, I have a couple thoughts.
First, you allocate a block of memory, escape_char, to hold the copy of the
token to this point. But the size of the block is 4 on most machines, the
sizeof a pointer to char. So this size will frequently not be enough to copy
all the characters preceding the escaped character.
It occurs to me that guththila tries to go to a lot of effort to avoid
allocating memory. Having worked on some issues recently in the buffer
management code, I would propose a different solution: moving the data in the
buffer itself. Although the obvious solution would be to replace the escaped
sequence with the intended character and slide the remainder of the buffer
down, this could be timeconsuming. A clever idea might be to replace the
escaped sequence, placing the intended character at the end of the sequence,
and copy the characters up from the start of the token, moving the token start
up and reducing its size. In most cases, this would not be a large amount of
data to move, and it avoids the memory allocation entirely.
Second, I like where you chose to insert this code, in the token_close logic.
Although I can imagine trying to make this part of guththila_next, where it
could massage the buffer contents while it was deciding where the token
boundaries are, it seems best to leave that logic deciding where the edges of
the tokens are without changing the characters inside the tokens.
Third, looking at the examples of character escaping in various texts, it
appears that one can find escaped character sequences in text and in attribute
values. So this logic either needs to be duplicated, not pretty, or pushed
down into a lower level shared routine.
Fourth, you inserted this logic in the _char_data: case. It appears to me from
the XML documentation that we are supposed to replace sequences in text, but
not in comments. guththila_next() seems to confuse this issue, as it treats
them both as _char_data. To distinguish the two, my guess is it would be
better to define a new token type, rather than cheat and look at the
m->guththila_event to tell them apart. A new token type might point the
direction to solving the CDATA problem, whenever that gets approached. Maybe
use _char_data for the raw char data, without processing, and a new _text_data
for char data that undergoes processing of entity sequences.
Fifth, when checking the following characters after the ampersand, it would be
best to check first that enough characters are left in the token, before
looking at the characters themselves and perhaps falling off the end of the
buffer.
Of course, I'm relatively new to this logic, so these are just my observations.
> guththila parser fails to handle escape sequences for ampersand, less than,
> greater than
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS2C-859
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-859
> Project: Axis2-C
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: guththila
> Affects Versions: Current (Nightly)
> Environment: Windows XP, Visual Studio 2005, guththila parser, libcurl
> Reporter: Bill Mitchell
> Attachments: diff.txt
>
>
> When an incoming message contains within text the escaped ampersand sequence,
> "&", this sequence is being passed to the client as raw text without
> being converted to the single ampersand character. Clearly, this action must
> take place at the level of the parser, as only the parser knows whether it is
> seeing simple text, and conversion is required, or text embedded in a CDATA
> section, where conversion is not allowed. I have tested the build with the
> libxml parser, and of course the libxml parser behaves correctly: the text
> passed to the client contains only the single ampersand character, not the
> escaped sequence. (See section 2.4 of XML 1.0 spec.)
> Looking at the code, I expect the same problem occurs with all escaped
> sequences, less than and greater than as well as ampersand, on both input and
> output. I also don't see where CDATA sections are handled, but as I am not
> seeing CDATA in the messages from the service I am hitting, I have not tested
> this case.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]