Hi Dinesh, Thanks.
Also let's make it a practice to include references to such documents in the future. I'm at guilt for most such missing comments in portions that I have added. I'm a bit busy this week. I will try to trace such instances and add relevant documentation in the coming week. Regards, Senaka > Hi, > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi again, >> >> The revision should be corrected as, 640355. Sorry for the confusion. >> >> Regards, >> Senaka >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > It seems that Revision 639197 has replaced "Axis2C/1.3.0" with >> "Axis2/C >> > 1.3.0" which is a violation of "Product Tokens specification" in RFC >> 2616. >> > I recently corrected this, but, it seems that it has got back to what >> it >> > was. :(... I apologize for the missing comment. > > > I made this change while replacing that string with a macro. I didn't > aware > about RFC 2616, will make necessary changes. > > thanks, > Dinesh > -- > http://nethu.org/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
