Dinesh Premalal wrote:
Hi Varuna and all,
"Supun Kamburugamuva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So I think it is better to stick to the convention and use those long names.
Also you don't have to put everything in a long format. The only important
thing is the axiom part. You can shorten other things if the names are getting
too long. i.e axiom_xp_eng instead of axiom_xpath_engine.
I also think, stick to the convention is a good thing although it
makes quite lengthy names. However I prefer axiom_xpath_engine rather
than axiom_xp_eng. axiom_xpath_engine is more readable I guess.
+ for axiom_xpath_engine like naming over axiom_xp_engine. As I
understand using abbreviated names in the past made the code less
readable. Now we have removed column width limitation of 80 it should
make no problem in have long names. But we should not misuse this
facilty by using unneccessary long names in places where it can be avoied.
thanks
Damitha
thanks,
Dinesh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
