[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609214#action_12609214
]
Damitha Kumarage commented on AXIS2C-1210:
------------------------------------------
dual channel samples should work for tcp if you specify in the options the
transport-in protocol. Also I don't see any wrong in specifying a default
transport-in protocol in case user don't specifically set the transport in
protocol in the options struct. However your suggestion of inferring
transport-in protocol from the reply-to address seems a more elegant approach.
> Service Client does not Pick the Correct Transport Receiver
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS2C-1210
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1210
> Project: Axis2-C
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/transport
> Affects Versions: Current (Nightly)
> Reporter: Danushka Menikkumbura
>
> In dual-channel scenarios, the service client (the listener manager) picks
> the transport receiver based on the value of the service client option,
> "transport_in_protocol". By default this has the value
> AXIS2_TRANSPORT_ENUM_HTTP and hence, the listener manager starts an HTTP
> receiver irrespective of the actual transport receiver unless we specify the
> transport_in_protocol explicitly using
> axis2_options_set_transport_in_protocol in the client implementation. But we
> should keep this setting transparent to the client programmer and ideally we
> can set this value inside the axis2_options_set_reply_to call because it is
> possible to infer the transport protocol by looking at the reply-to address.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
