Hi Danushka,
We could easily wrap the base context functions in conf_ctx, op_ctx,
svc_ctx, svc_grp_ctx and msg_ctx. But this considerbly increase the
lines of code. As I remember this was the main reason for not doing it
previously. However I also agree that it is nice to have these wrapper
functions in main contexts.
Thanks,
Damitha
Danushka Menikkumbura wrote:
Hi Devs,
We have been using the base context of conf_ctx to keep custom
properties. What we normally do is, get the base context and use its
(axis2_ctx) API to set/get properties. And we use external mutexes for
synchronization. Why don't we have get/set calls in conf_ctx API
itself so that we can set/get properties without any hassle. And that
way we can use the mutex in conf_ctx to handle synchronization. I
think that is the cleaner way of accessing the base.
Any thoughts?
Danushka
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
__________________________________________________________________
Damitha Kumarage
http://people.apache.org/
__________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]