Hi Danushka,
We could easily wrap the base context functions in conf_ctx, op_ctx, svc_ctx, svc_grp_ctx and msg_ctx. But this considerbly increase the lines of code. As I remember this was the main reason for not doing it previously. However I also agree that it is nice to have these wrapper functions in main contexts.

Thanks,
Damitha

Danushka Menikkumbura wrote:
Hi Devs,
We have been using the base context of conf_ctx to keep custom properties. What we normally do is, get the base context and use its (axis2_ctx) API to set/get properties. And we use external mutexes for synchronization. Why don't we have get/set calls in conf_ctx API itself so that we can set/get properties without any hassle. And that way we can use the mutex in conf_ctx to handle synchronization. I think that is the cleaner way of accessing the base.

Any thoughts?

Danushka

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
__________________________________________________________________

Damitha Kumarage
http://people.apache.org/
__________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to