May be you can embed it as base64 string. Samisa...
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:53:28 +0000, John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Not quite sure what you mean when you say "embed". If you mean embed as a > big string then sure you can - if that's what your service takes. But I'm > not sure if thats what you mean? > > 1.6 - dates not defined as yet. Attachments almost made it into 1.5 so it > could be that actually they would be available before the release date by > some substantial time but noone has committed yet. > > > > > > > "Petecg_76" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 15/02/2005 16:33 > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C User List" > To"'Apache AXIS C User List'" <[email protected]> > cc > SubjectRE: Send VCard in SOAP - AxisC++ > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > This brings me out two questions: > > 1. Can I embed the VCard directly into the SOAP messages (and > therefore do not use attachments) > 2. Which is the planned date for the 1.6 release? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: John Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: martes, 15 de febrero de 2005 14:28 > To: Apache AXIS C User List > Subject: Re: Send VCard in SOAP - AxisC++ > > > Hi Pete, > > Attachments in C/C++ are not supported in 1.5 release (one just coming up). > However, we hope to support them in 1.6 > > regards, > John Hawkins, > > > > > > "Petecg_76" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 15/02/2005 11:53 > > > Please respond to > "Apache AXIS C User List" > > To<[email protected]> > cc > SubjectSend VCard in SOAP - AxisC++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > I am designing a Web service that will have to send/receive one or more > VCards in soap request/response messages. > I have not much knowledge about encoding but as far as I've read, I may use > MIME, DIME encodings. Anyone experienced in this?? > > I was wondering whether using attachments in SOAP or not, i.e. actually > embedding the VCard in the soap messages. > Can I already use SOAP Attachments in Axis C++. Is there any doc I may > follow to put some light in this? > > Thanks a lot? > Pete > > >
