Re: Deployment of Axis C++ & 2.0 vs. 1.6?

[John Hawkins]

hi,


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/05/2006 07:50:16:

> Hi,
> We are thinking about using axis-c++ in one of our current projects.
During
> our analysis several questions about using Axis-c++ arose. It would
be great
> if you could help us with some of our issues or point us to further
> information:
> 
> - What is the suggested deployment scenario when using axis c++ in
a
> multi-threaded server environment. As we understand you offer the
option of
> using the mod interface to Apache or to use the SimpleAxisServer as
a server
> hull for the deployed web-services. When no web-server functionality
is
> needed which option is recommended. Or in other words: According to
your
> experience which option is the more stable one?
I would suggest Apache.

> - In future versions of our product we might need to incorporate server
> functionality that shares state between the client and the server.
Is there
> any support for session handling in the two deployment scenarios above?

Well, "kinda" We have *some* support for
cookies in the client - but I'm not aware that anyone has ever served cookies
from Apache to the client. 

> - On the axis-c++ website you mention that you are planning to release
the
> final version 1.6 in mid march. Is 1.6 still developed or are you
> concentrating all your efforts on axis 2?

1.6 is still being developed and should be released
soon. Axis2C is probably going to be concentrated on in the future in order
to get ws-* however, there are a lot of people who use Axis1C and that
inevitably means it'll keep getting used/updated to some level.

regards,
John.

> 
> Thanks in advance (and thanks for providing your great tool as well!!),
> Markus 
> 
> -- 
> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail