Kaushalye Kapuruge wrote: > Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: >> Mark Nüßler wrote: >>> hello users, >>> >>> on 26.09.2007 Royston Day found an issue, >>> i just correct my svn-code localy. >>> >>> Can someone have a look - 4 me Royston is >>> right. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-731 >> I think Rampart folks uses base64 encoding. Can someone using rampart >> please verify that the proposed code it correct. >> > I tried with the new code and it worked fine for all the scenarios in > Rampart/C. But I'm concerned about the interoperability. So it's too > early to say that new implementation is correct unless it is > inter-operable with other implementations. I'll update on that later.
axutil_base64_decode_len() is the same implementation as that of the apr_base64_decode_len() found in libapr. AFAIK, this does not returns the exact decoded length of the encoded string, but returns at least as many number of bytes that is necessary. Exact length is anyway returned by the [axutil/apr]_base64_decode(). Thus, if the length returned from the proposed code is correct, there should be no problems with interoperability. -Dumindu. -- Dumindu Pallewela http://blog.dumindu.com GPG ID: 0x9E131672 WSO2 | http://wso2.com | "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
