Please see the inline comment. On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Dimuthu Gamage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Nadir, > > If I start with answering your questions straight away, > > 1. In Axis2/Java (with Axis2/Java codegen tool) you can use wrapped or > unwrapped mode ( -uw option) for any wsdl regardless whether it is a > (just doc-lit, doc-lit bare or doc-lit wrapped wsdl.) But unlike > Axis2/Java, Axis2/C still doesn't do any special for the unwrapped > option (I think this can be fixed easily with a little hack). > > For an example say you have a simpleAdd schema element > > <xs:element name="simpleAdd"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element minOccurs="0" name="param0" > nillable="true" type="xs:int"/> > <xs:element minOccurs="0" name="param1" > nillable="true" type="xs:int"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > > for wrapped mode the api is like this ( support both Axis2/C and Axis2/ Java) > > simpleAdd( param: simpleAdd); // you have to set param0, param1 within > the simpleAdd adb Class > > for unwrapped mode (support only in Axis2/Java) > > simpleAdd(param0: int, param1: int); > > > 2. I too agree with what you mentioned, it is just the client api > should be different in doc -lit and doc-list wrapped mode. But the > codegen tool doesn't care what is the mode of the actual wsdl, it just > care about the user option -uw to generate a different (rpc-like) API. > > Thanks > Dimuthu > > > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Nadir Amra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How does axis2/C handle document/literal wrapped vs. unwrapped? Does it >> support it? What is the default? When I generate client stubs it seems >> it is always the case that the following is generated: >> >> adb_phoneStatusResponse_t* >> axis2_stub_op_IPTelephonyService_phoneStatusRequest( >> axis2_stub_t *stub, >> const >> axutil_env_t *env, >> adb_phoneStatusRequest_t* _phoneStatusRequest); >> >> Even if I specify -uw >> >> So I am curious about the following: >> >> (1) When is wrapped vs. unwrapped used? >> >> (2) Is there actually a difference in SOAP request between the two?
AFAIK there is one difference in SOAP requests in two forms. In doc-lit wsdls the operation name is equal to the first body child element, where as in other cases it can be any name. So As I said earlier mail the codegen tool handle that different internally and give the API depending on the user option Thanks Dimuthu From >> my readings it seems that this is more of a programming interface aspect >> than anything else - that is, whether the child elements of the wrapper >> element are listed as parameters or whether a structure is used. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> Nadir Amra >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
