Lilantha, See http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/xml-xerces/c/Projects/ and http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/xml-xalan/c/Projects/ and http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/xml-security/c/Projects/ and model your environment based on that as well.
PLEASE do some research on how other Apache projects setup their build environments. -- dims --- Lilantha Darshana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:02:56 -0700, Steve Loughran wrote > > > > I dont think the C++ project has the critical mass to spin off > > yet...commit messages let people who care keep an eye on things. I > > for example, note that you are still using VC6 and wonder about what > > would happen if I tried to build it on VC7.1, or more importantly, > > debate about how much effort it would take for me to add an ant file > > to do the c++ stuff (which is how we integrate C++ with anthill in > > my current project) > > I guess you will not see any problem when you try to build the code > using VC7.1, you just import the VC6 project files in VC7 IDE & build. > Because, code is written using the portable set of C++ there wont be > any problem of building using these compilers. > Further, > IMO: I would say to have set of auto tools files to build > the code on both Unix & Win32 (using CYGWIN or MinGW) > and have additionally KDevelop, VC6, VC7, BC etc, IDE projects to make it > convenient for users to build using IDE's and to browse the code. > > To add an Ant build file, the effort would be of identifying all > the dependencies! that of using makefile etc.!! > Because, Ant is not widely used to build C/C++ projects, having an Ant > build file is optional, I guess. since makefile does that task very well. > > Thanks > -Lilantha > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
