[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1771?page=comments#action_57891 ] Venkat Reddy commented on AXIS-1771: ------------------------------------
Some more notes: deser.parse() consumes only about 15 times the size the soap message it is dealing with, whether multi-ref is true or not. However the soap message gets about 3 times larger with multi-ref on. So i think what we are asking for is optimizing the soap message size when multi-ref is on. 15 is the ratio when we don't run GC before calling dser.parse(). It falls to about 10 if we run GC there. Is the ratio of 15 not acceptable? Attaching the client code that i'm using. Venkat > Excessive Memory Use During Serialization/Deserialization > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AXIS-1771 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1771 > Project: Axis > Type: Bug > Components: Basic Architecture > Versions: 1.2RC2 > Environment: JDK 1.4.2, Mac OS X, Linux, Windows > Reporter: Peter Molettiere > Assignee: Venkat Reddy > Attachments: MTC_venkat.java, SOAPmsg_multiref_false.xml, > SOAPmsg_multiref_true.xml, SerializationContext.java.diff, > memory-use-test.tgz, recursion.png > > Axis uses pathological amounts of memory during the > serialization/deserialization process. > We see about a 30 to 1 ratio of memory used during (de)serialization to > in-memory representation of the objects being (de)serialized. So ser/deser in > axis of a 2M graph of objects uses 288M of memory! Further, the memory used > seems to scale linearly with the size of the object graph being serialized. > The memory used does seem to be released once serialization is done, so this > isn't a leak. > Using the attached example code, (based on the code used to demonstrate > AXIS-1423) you can see this behavior. The test automatically runs with a max > heap size of 1024M, and runs out of memory serializing a 28M object graph. > As provided, it generates the following output: > Buildfile: build.xml > build: > [javac] Compiling 1 source file to /Users/pietro/Work/Axis Memory > Test/build/classes > run: > [java] - Unable to find required classes (javax.activation.DataHandler > and javax.mail.internet.MimeMultipart). Attachment support is disabled. > [java] Created tree with 5 levels and 3 children at each level > [java] Axis used 13 MBytes to serialize 230 KBytes, a ratio of 30.0 > [java] GC freed 13 MBytes > [java] Created tree with 5 levels and 4 children at each level > [java] Axis used 71 MBytes to serialize 1 MBytes, a ratio of 31.0 > [java] GC freed 71 MBytes > [java] Created tree with 5 levels and 5 children at each level > [java] Axis used 288 MBytes to serialize 2 MBytes, a ratio of 51.0 > [java] GC freed 287 MBytes > [java] Created tree with 5 levels and 6 children at each level > [java] Axis used 671 MBytes to serialize 11 MBytes, a ratio of 29.0 > [java] GC freed 675 MBytes > [java] Created tree with 5 levels and 7 children at each level > [java] Out of Memory serializing 28 MBytes tree. > [java] Java Result: 1 > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > Total time: 2 minutes 51 seconds > Note that the ratios are halved from the reported values, since it includes > both serialization and deserialization of the object graph. So axis uses > 30.5M to serialize a 1M message, and another 30.5M to deserialize it, > resulting in the reported 71M reported above. Also, notice that the ratio > stays close to 30 to 1 regardless of object graph size. This is the linear > scaling I mention above. > Note also, that if you tweak the code to generate very small object graphs, > you see extremely high ratios, but I would expect this due to simple one-time > overhead to operate on very small amounts of data. That's why I start with > the graph size that I do. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
