Hi all, See my comments below.
> > Hi all, > I am definitley +1 for having Thilina as a commiter. He has done good > code and I have no doubt that he is the guy to MTOMize OM. > However I am still 0- on integrating the code to the main stream > *right now*. I've looked at Thilinas MTOM architecture and in my view > it is the most reasonable MTOM implementation we can do on OM.But I > strongly think we should wait till the F2F to discuss MTOM in bit more > detail and then do it. I agree with you that we need more things to be clarified in the next f2f. But as I have worked with Thilina, I know how difficult for him to work in the scratch area. He has to get a separate build from the main tree, put that in to his scratch and do changes and ...... So its reasonable from his side to put that in the main src area. Plus, as we do, we can always scrap whatever we do and start over again. But putting MTOM stuff in to the main tree will not hinder that. You can always do changes, and do whatever there too. Even Axis 2 it self is in that state. And MTOM stuff Thilina has done is mature enough to go in to the main src area. So I propose, we should put that in the main src area, as Dims has also proposed. (At least that will make Thilina's life easier). Shall We ?? Thilina, better if you can create wiki on MTOM and put whatever documentation there. Regards, Chinthaka Since MTOM is a major turn, my guess is we > should do this patiently, rather than in a hurry. > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:21:56 +0600, Eran Chinthaka > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is > > good and it integrates with OM smoothly. > > > > So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area. > > > > And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer. > > > > -- Chinthaka > > > > > > -- > Ajith Ranabahu
