+1! Sanjiva.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aleksander Slominski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:29 AM Subject: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch > Chathura Herath wrote: > > >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal. > > > > > +1 > > alek > > >I am with the idea that we should go ahead and MTOMize the OM if we have the > >right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to me, but would like to see a > >bit of a documentation and other views (if any) too. > > > >Regards > >Chathura > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM > >>To: [email protected] > >>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch > >> > >>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer > >> > >> > >>Deepal. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is > >>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly. > >>> > >>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area. > >>> > >>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer. > >>> > >>>-- Chinthaka > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM > >>>>To: [email protected]; Ajith Ranabahu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch > >>>> > >>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support? > >>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were > >>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete > >>>>realization. > >>>> > >>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer? > >>>> > >>>>Sanjiva. > >>>> > >>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>To: <[email protected]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM > >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi dims, > >>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main > >>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM > >>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>scratch > >> > >> > >>>>>area for the time being. > >>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the > >>>>>first place :)) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas > >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-- dims > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne > >>>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Thanks, > >>>>>>>Thilina. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>-- > >>>>>Ajith Ranabahu > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay > >
