Hi Ashutosh,
> > Sent this mail, but could not see it delivered, so resending. My > apologies if you receive multiple copies. > > > > Hi all, > > I see that we have a separate OMAttribute class, and OMAttribute is > treated differently from other node types. OMAttribute was a derived class of OMNode, earlier. That was a wrong decision and later we changed that to the current state. There was a thread on that in this mailing list. > But, at the same time in > OMNode class also we have a field to set the Node Type as > ATTRIBUTE_NODE. I think we should remove that. This was a thing slipped through the last change. -- Chinthaka >How are these two different and why can't we just go > with the OMNode class? > > Ashutosh
