Hi Ashutosh,

> 
> Sent this mail, but could not see it delivered, so resending. My
> apologies if you receive multiple copies.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I see that we have a separate OMAttribute class, and OMAttribute is
> treated differently from other node types. 

OMAttribute was a derived class of OMNode, earlier. That was a wrong
decision and later we changed that to the current state. There was a thread
on that in this mailing list.

> But, at the same time in
> OMNode class also we have a field to set the Node Type as
> ATTRIBUTE_NODE. 

I think we should remove that. This was a thing slipped through the last
change.

-- Chinthaka

>How are these two different and why can't we just go
> with the OMNode class?




> 
> Ashutosh



Reply via email to