sure thing! I'll post my test case to the group or wiki Bye Jaya On Apr 11, 2005 2:43 PM, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Hi Dims! > > Thanks for the pointer to XMLUnit. So far, I was using a trial version > > of XMLDiff in quite an ugly fashion...phew!!! > > Today I incorporated the XMLUnit and tested the conformance in the > > suggested three step fashion. Load, Save, Compare. And the results > > stand as follows Of all the files present in the suite, 435 files were > > parsed and built into a serializable object model without throwing > > exceptions. But of them only 381 files have the serialized xml (from > > OM datastructures) matching with the original xml file used as input. > > That looks promising ;) > > > > > As of now, in OM, comment elements are not taken care of. I think I > > can manage Comment information item. That can improve the success rate > > by good amount. I'm currently finalizing the interface of OMComment. > > Did u committed the stuff to the main tree ?? > > Plus, can u please publish the test stuff in a wiki as well. So that > other people ,might also be able to re-test the stuff with your > guidelines. > > Regards, > > -- Chinthaka > > > On Apr 8, 2005 2:34 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/ > > > > > > On Apr 7, 2005 3:51 PM, Mark D. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > could you provide a link to the test suite? > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: jayachandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 2:13 AM > > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > > > > > Subject: [Axis2]w3c XML Test suite Conformance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Guys! > > > > > > > > > > Our team here tested to see where our current OM implementation stands > > > > > on the w3c xml test suite conformance and found out that, of the 2500 > > > > > odd sample XMLs given there, around 490 are getting properly parsed > > > > > without any excpetions getting thrown. The rest of the files are > > > > > failing because most of them contained the unsupported DTD, PI and > > > > > Comment element types in them. XML Infoset spec requires > > > > > implementation for these three types as well. Comment elements appear > > > > > manageable and I was successful in implementing (just a rough work > > > > > though) them. But the rest two seem slightly complex to me. Any > > > > > ideas/suggestions/pointers, helping hands interested in taking this > > > > > forward? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > Jaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > > > > > > -- > > -- Jaya > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Eran Chinthaka >
-- -- Jaya
