+1 for WSDL2Code. Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 08:24 -0400, Glen Daniels wrote: > Axis1 does have the "generic" WSDL2 classes and the more specific Java ones, > and was in fact designed with exactly the same idea (generating stubs/skels > for multiple languages). I would prefer something like "WSDLCodeGenerator" > or "WSDL2Code" over "WSDL2WS", just because I think it'd be easier to > understand. > > --Glen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 7:46 PM > Subject: Re: [Axis2] WSDL2Java renamed? > > > > Hi Tom! > > > >> > Renamed the WSDL2Java to WSDL2WS > >> > >> Sorry to jump in late here. I am really not a fan of naming the command > >> WSDL2WS. What does 'WS' mean? Is this generating Java code? Notice > >> that Axis 1.x has the WSDL2 structure, which allows you to implement > >> other language back ends. > > > > The reason it was changed is because it allows multiple target langs to > > be generated. Right now Ajith has it generating C# stubs as well and has > > run Axis2 inside .Net with IKVM and used the stubs from other .Net > > stuff. > > > >> I am -1 on changing the name of a tool as basic as WSDL2Java. > > > > I'm ok with having a convenience class called WSDL2Java that sets the > > target language to Java. However, we do need a name for the basic thing > > which is capable of producing whatever language. (The code generator > > uses XSLT stubs actually.) > > > > What name do u suggest for the basic thing? > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > >
