[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1797?page=comments#action_66594 ] Jayachandra Sekhara Rao Sunkara commented on AXIS-1797: -------------------------------------------------------
Hi Steve, running the given Test.java against the artifacts created from the SimpleTypes.wsdl you have provided yielded me following results Using 1.2 source without applying your patch. --------------------------------------------- <ns1:localpart DerivedAttr1="nonce" xsi:type="ns2:DerivedSimpleType" xmlns:ns1=" http://namespace"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns:ns 2="http://test.com/reference";>abc123</ns1:localpart> After applying your patch: -------------------------- <ns1:localpart DerivedAttr1="nonce" xsi:type="ns2:DerivedSimpleType" xmlns:ns1="http://namespace"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns:ns2="http://test.com/reference";>abc123</ns1:localpart> Actually even after the patch is applied, I couldn't see in the serialized piece of XML the values of BaseAttr1 and BaseAttr2. However I noticed that the DerivedSimpleType class created by WSDL2Java came out extending BaseSimpleType class without the _value datamember in it. Is the patch complete enough? or did I miss something? Can you post the response you got after running Test.java with your patch applied. Does it have in total three attributes? Thanks Jayachandra > Base attributes not serialized when simpleContent extends another > simpleContent > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AXIS-1797 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1797 > Project: Axis > Type: Bug > Components: WSDL processing > Versions: current (nightly) > Reporter: Steve Green > Attachments: 1797.patch, 1797.test.tar, 1797.wsdl, Test.java > > When a simpleContent extends another simpleContent, and the base type has > attributes, those attributes are not serialized. > I believe that the problem is with the code generation, and not a > serialization bug. The code generator uses a has-a model for this, and I > believe that it should be an is-a model. This is also necessary to allow for > polymorphic behavior in the generated classes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
