Sanjiva, Did you read my email? i said explicitly "any effort to at least architect the code" am not asking us to add support. If i did, i'd open a JIRA issue, just like i did for others.
-- dims On 7/18/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 11:41 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > You do agree with the principle of getting the faulty impl corrected, > > > right? > > > > if we determine that it is faulty. then yes. let's not change it for now. > > I thought that Thilina's message dump and spec dump showed that it was > indeed faulty. Unless there's something wrong in his evidence let's push > on the MSFT folks to fix it. Its still CTP code so I'm sure its > relatively straightforward, unlike if it was a major released version. > > Simon: Can you please take a look at the stuff and let us know your > interpretation of the spec and the impls please? > > > > What did you mean by "mime"? > > > > typo i meant dime > > DIME is dead'er than the copper penny .. even MSFT has abandoned it. I > don't see any reason to support it ... esp. not in Axis2. Let's keep > Axis2 as clean as possible without adding support for "other" stuff. > > Sanjiva. > > > -- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
