Sending to the group.... done a mistake with reply @.... Hi, That Cid thing was handled well and in a spec compliant way in earlier code :).........When i said CID processing it included "<>" + stringping off cid too. I have a fixed version with me now. Thinking whether to commit or not...
I'm really sorry for my very slow responsiveness these days. I have to submit a huge report to the campus by end of next week + Kandula rearchitecting in my head... I'll try to catch the things up as soon as possible.... Regards, ~Thilina On 7/19/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the code in question will strip the '<' and '>' from content-id in > the mime part and then add it to the internal collection of parts. > > Question is IF the '<'/'>' is absent then should we throw an error or not. > > Thilina, > BTW, i saw another problem. if i see the whitemesa traces > (http://www.whitemesa.net/mtom-cr-traces/mtom-cr-2a-resp.txt) > > in the xml part they use: > <xop:Include href="cid:uuid:3C689526-B778-4059-B0C6-0D01120167B8"; /> > > and in the mimepart they use: > Content-Id: <uuid:3C689526-B778-4059-B0C6-0D01120167B8> > > note that cid: is not present in the mimepart. according to the RFC, > is this incorrect? > > -- dims > > On 7/19/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let him at least write the code and then you can -1 it. what's gotten > > into you? :) > > > > -- dims > > > > On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > An ENTIRE line of bug-compatible code?? Oh my god, how terrible! Hell > > > no, definite -1 on that one!!!! > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:31 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > it's a one line change!!! > > > > > > > > On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 07:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > > Can we do this? let's try to be accomodating to what we accept > > > > > > (means > > > > > > accept messages with or without '<' and '>') but generate messages > > > > > > according to the RFC? At least till we get confirmation from the > > > > > > folks > > > > > > researching the problem? > > > > > > > > > > Um .. temporary bug compat mode? I'd rather just let it be until we > > > > > get > > > > > feedback from the MSFT guys .. I'm sure they'll report back soon > > > > > saying > > > > > "yes its a bug we'll fix it" and then we can do the right thing. Once > > > > > you start putting these "conveniences" it becomes hard to remove 'em > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/ > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/ > -- "May the SourcE be with u" http://www.bloglines.com/blog/thilina -- "May the SourcE be with u" http://www.bloglines.com/blog/thilina
