On 8/7/05, Venkat Reddy <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me. That sounds more like arithmetic progression than a
geometric one ;-)
- venkat
On 8/5/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> -- dims
>
> On 8/5/05, Glen Daniels < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm all for "release early / release often", but I think we might have
> > jumped the gun a little with "0.9 "... :) I agree with Jaya and others
> > about first impressions and the power of the "1.0" number.
> >
> > How about we plan to call this next one "0.91" rather than " 0.95" -
> > which gives us nine more "early and often" releases if we need them
> > before 1.0....?
> >
> > --Glen
> >
> > Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > yep, no question about it. 1.0 is a very strong number indeed and cutting
> > > the 1.0 is no childs play. I guess the code needs to be a tested more and
> > > WSDS2Java definitley needs improvements.
> > > The next release (the release we are planning now) is .95. It's more of an
> > > effort to go with "release often" part of the motto "Release early, release
> > > often" :)
> > >
> > > On 8/5/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>My sincere thought is... if the version 1.0 (such a darn powerful
> > >>number that it is) is out, people already frame impressions about
> > >>Axis2 in general. And if it's out without being solid enough, first
> > >>impressions on Axis2 can be not so welcome ones. We will have to face
> > >>tough times advertising later its improved functionality, whenever
> > >>that happens. As the saying goes 'we never get a second chance to make
> > >>a first impression'. This has been worrying me.
> > >>
> > >>Just a thought, though!
> > >>Jayachandra
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
