Hi everyone, Chinthaka and I will likely move forward with trying to implement a StAX parser for Dennis' XBIS format for Axis2, instead of sticking with DFDL. Does that sound reasonable to everyone?
Thanks, Mark On 8/16/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 07:01 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:16 -0700, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > > > I'll just refer back to our earlier discussion on this topic: > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=112131569306784&w=2 ;-) > > > > > > - Dennis > > > > > > > +1 to using some XML Infoset binary serialization format rather than > > DFDL. > > I forgot to mention .. I would like to introduce a typed pull API > (extending StAX) into Axis2 (and implement it the obvious way). When > data binding is in place and if the data is being serialized, for > non-string data this can make a big difference. A common use case is > using Axis2 to deal with large numerical data sets .. if we go with a > binary typed stax approach, there's no intrinsic reason that should be > any slower or memory intensive than any other binary protocol approach. > > After v1.0, of course ;-). > > Sanjiva. > > >
