did anybody use wsdl 2.0 for production? I know people will, but it is not a concern for the users right now. We relase for the real world .. to me holding axis2 out due to wsdl2 is unfair
let us implemet the thing when spec is final, and wsdl4j equivent comes out. I see know reason we need to dealy Axis2 for wsdl2. reagrding alpha vs .9x, alpha states that Axis2 1.0 near .. I belive features shouldnot change across alpha beta ..final ..so they are differernt from the 9.x Srinath On 9/24/05, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Loughran wrote: > > > Tom Jordahl wrote: > > > >> I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1 > >> and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java). I > >> don't think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front. > >> > >> > >> > >> I would much rather release early/often with a .92, .93, .95, etc. > > > > > > That might be a better approach. A point number to mean "ready to > > use", a value <1.0. > > I note that there is a very large number of floating point values > > between 0.92 and 1.0 > > +1 to .92 - in my interpretation, all the releases to this point have > been alpha releases. If the progressive version numbering suddenly > changes to "1.0 alpha" it's just going to confuse potential users. I'd > prefer to stick with .9X until a solid 1.0 release candidate is available. > > - Dennis >
