Most definitely +1 .. go for it! Sanjiva.
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:01 +0100, Steve Loughran wrote: > I am looking at the current axis fault stuff. Is anybody actively > working on this, or am I free to add enhancements? > > Specifically: > > 1. All the bits of a SOAPFAult, including random XML > > 2. Axis1 features: stack trace extractions, hostname, http error codes. > > 3. Tweak how we map from a java fault to a SOAPFault. If a fault says > that it can provide a fault message then we ask it for it directly. This > lets people's classes (like my BaseFault) generate my own fault with no > intervention. > > WS-A says that addressing faults are handled differently, with most of > the stuff in special headers, rather than just the body. How does Axis2 > handle that in both generation and receipt? Maybe an AxisFault should > have a header section where you can add new header elements for both > outbound and inbound calls. > > -steve > >
