On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:28 +0000, Steve Loughran wrote: > > 1. when I started using axis2 0.92 you only had one service per aar; I > had two EPRs so had no other choice.
Yep .. and it was in fact your suggestion which lead to the multiple services / aar feature. Thanks! > Given the amount of effort it took > to get up to the state where axis.093 worked I have no desire to made > needless changes to other parts of the process. Fair enough .. BTW what u meant is the nightly build and not 0.93 as we haven't released 0.93 yet! > So to conclude, I think my deployment framework is more flexible and > powerful than those built into single applications, be they axis2, > jboss, tomcat, BIND, Vmware, mySQL whatever. We can handle them all in > a single deployment operation over a secure channel, then federate that > to the 500 nodes of a supercluster. Very cool. FYI we're not trying to compete with Smartfog's deployment framework by any means. What's in Axis2 is hopefully sufficient for people to easily manage deploying multiple services safely so that the classes don't conflict etc.. > All I am trying to do w/ Axis2 is provide a SOAP interface for long-haul > deployment, and come to terms with the requirements for WSRF integration > that the grid people want. Cool. Sanjiva.
