On 12/2/05, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
great :)
over in jakartaland we're been getting a steady (but thankfully slow) drip of queries about provenance and process over the last few months. most of them have been cleaned up but it's much easier to clear up issus at the time than years later: it takes quite a lot of energy to do forensic analysis which could have been better used elsewhere if we'd just been a bit sharper at the time.
i'm glad this is covered on the list in the public record but could you add a full comment explaining the circumstances when you commit the classes with the right headers. (i've had to track down emails from years ago on busy lists and isn't always that easy.)
Robert
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> i really hate to do this but i have to -1
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/trunk/java/modules/core/src/org/apache/axis2/fault/AbstractFaultCode.java
>
> the ASF cannot risk shipping code with dubious provinence.
>
> - robert
>
no its my fault, it wasnt published anywhere, I just wrote it in my
laptop's IDE that was set up to add the headers for my day job, which is
an LGPL project. There are no provenance issues.
All I have to do is fix the headers.
great :)
over in jakartaland we're been getting a steady (but thankfully slow) drip of queries about provenance and process over the last few months. most of them have been cleaned up but it's much easier to clear up issus at the time than years later: it takes quite a lot of energy to do forensic analysis which could have been better used elsewhere if we'd just been a bit sharper at the time.
i'm glad this is covered on the list in the public record but could you add a full comment explaining the circumstances when you commit the classes with the right headers. (i've had to track down emails from years ago on busy lists and isn't always that easy.)
Robert
