Hi Deepal:
Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
Hi Chamikara;
I am not sure I am giving the right answer, any way the reason behind
treating Message reciver seperately is the following
say that you add message receiver as the end of the operation chain
and you just call msgCnx.invoke(); , what if some one change the
handler chain at the runtime to add a handler after the message
receiver. To avoid that kind of scenario we treat Message Receiver
separately.
Isn't that easily solved by just having the MessageReceiver be set as
the last handler?
--Glen
