+1 from me. On 1/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1! > > Sanjiva. > > On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 16:24 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote: > > Hi all; > > > > Without having a knowledge of module version user should be able to engage a > > module . In that case we have to get the default version > > (there will be two ways of engaging a module ) > > 1. engageModule(String moduleName); > > 2 . engageModule(String moduleName , String moduleVersion); > > > > Finding default version of some module if there are more than one module, > > 1. If there are multiple versions of the same module it can possible to > > specify the default version in axis2.xml as follows > > <defaultModuleVersions> > > <module name="abc" version="1.23"> > > <module name="foo" version="0.89"> > > </defaultModuleVersions> > > 2. If there are multiple versions of the same module and user does not > > specify that in axis2.xml then the default version will be the latest > > version > > > > comments .....? > > > > Thanks, > > Deepal > > ................................................................ > > ~Future is Open~ > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Deepal Jayasinghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 11:35 AM > > Subject: Re: [axis2] Module versions support > > > > > > >I think we are done with the format of the version number , > > > but I have some other problem to solve now say we have multiple version of > > > the same module in the system , and right now at the deployment time I > > > call the init method of each module (since we don't have the notion of > > > module version yet) , there if the module want to do some stuff they can > > > do that , as an example in RM case if it has saved some data they can get > > > them back at the initialization stage. > > > > > > But the problem is what are we going to do if there are multiple versions > > > of the same module , should we need to call init method of all the modules > > > ? where they are going to be engaged or not. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Deepal > > > ................................................................ > > > ~Future is Open~ > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Cc: <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:12 PM > > > Subject: Re: [axis2] Module versions support > > > > > > > > >> On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 00:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > >>> just reviewed the original email again...it talks about > > >>> xyz-00.0000.mar hence the confusion. > > >>> > > >>> So, we should go with say security-1.23.mar. Right? just to be > > >>> absolutely clear. > > >> > > >> Right .. or security-1.235486.mar etc... basically we expect the format > > >> to be modulename-{majorversion}.{minorversion}.mar where the two version > > >> #s are integers. (Major should not have any leading zeros but that's > > >> just a redundant comment - anyone who puts that deserves whatever > > >> behavior they get.) > > >> > > >> Sanjiva. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
