+1 to "merge that structure with Steve has defined to avoid duplication"
thanks, dims On 1/3/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, > > I think Steve started some time back on implementing faults for Axis2. > And I think its not completed and integrated. Shall we remove that > code from this release also, as its not being used ? I have few other > questions on impl deatails as well. > > 1. Why is the design completely stands away alone from OM. The impl > I did was an extension OM. IMO, if we create a separate object > model for faults, we will have two object models for faults. I > hope everyone agrees that we need to have the OM structure. So > if we can merge that structure with Steve has defined, we can > avoid duplication. > 2. The AbstractFaultCode class maintains an instance of its > subclass FaultSubCode and some references to that. I don't think > its a good decision, unless you have a very good reason. > > - -- Chinthaka > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFDuhesjON2uBzUhh8RAl7AAJ49GJewRObStojGipbzMU4p6V3ZDACfc3V8 > Fz0Yn1fQugxOY0dAFuRPu2Y= > =mBUO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
