I do not believe so. I think the problem was that we didn't enforce any order (like the order in the WSDL) and it could change (like when you switched JDK's).
I would love to see a patch that included a switch to WSDL2Java that would enforce either alphabetical or WSDL order for the constructor arguments. -- Tom Jordahl Adobe ColdFusion Team -----Original Message----- From: Tommaso Martini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:38 PM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Parameters order in Axis generated code Ok, is there a way to control this? Maybe some parameter of WSDL2Java? Tom Jordahl ha scritto: > This behavior was code intentionally so that code that is written to > construct these objects can have a deterministic way of doing so. > > So, its not a bug, it is a feature. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Adobe ColdFusion Team > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tommaso Martini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 1:04 PM > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > Subject: Parameters order in Axis generated code > > Hi everyone, > > as you reported on http://ws.apache.org/axis/bugs.html, I send this to the > developer mailing list (I already tried the user list but got no answer). > > I use Axis 1.3 (Java version) and I find it great! Anyway I noticed a > particular > behavior and I would like to know whether it is a feature or a bug. > > I develop web service in a bottom-up approach, so I write the implementation > class (let's call them "starting classes" for sake of simplicity) and then I > use > first Java2WSDL to get the wsdl file and then WSDL2Java to get the deployable > classes. In the generated classes, however, methods parameters are not > necessarily in the same order I wrote them in the starting classes, they get > inserted in alphabetical order. > > This caused me a lot of debugging in the past few days, as I didn't know it. > I have not found information on that, maybe I missed something in the doc? If > so, can someone direct me to the right section? > > Is this a bug? If not, is there any way to control the order of parameters in > the generated methods? > > Thank in advance for the help and for your great work. > > Tommaso Martini > > > > -- > Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f > > Sponsor: > Problemi di Liquidità ? Con Logos Finanziaria 30.000 € in 24 ore a dipendenti > e lavoratori autonomi con rimborsi fino a 120 mesi, clicca qui > * > Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2911&d=25-1 > -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Partecipa anche tu al concorso di Suzi Wan, potresti essere uno dei fortunati vincitori! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=4628&d=26-1