Ok, the move is completed now. AXIOM is now settled in its new home in WS-Commons.
How abt the issues filled against AXIOM ? I think we need to move them to WS-Commons JIRA. (later ;)) -- Chinthaka Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > I agree with the wider usefulness of AXIOM - it's a very clean model > for many different types of processing. +1 on the move. > > - Dennis > > Paul Fremantle wrote: > >> I think there is more benefit to this than just the WS-Policy. >> >> For example, AXIOM could be used by any of a number of projects that >> need a lazily-built tree. In Synapse, we use AXIOM extensively just >> to parse our config. And also, although Synapse has a heavy >> dependency on Axis2, the core model of Synapse was built to only >> depend on AXIOM. So I think this is worth doing now. >> >> It also seems to me that Axiom is pretty stable, which motivates it. >> >> But I agree, Dims, if that was the only reason, then it would be >> simple to fix. But the circular dependency is just an outcome of >> AXIOM getting wider usage as an XML model >> >> Paul >> >> On 1/30/06, *Davanum Srinivas* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Sanjiva, >> >> I have no problem doing it. I did not see a *strong* need from a >> code >> dependency point of view. If we just want do it, because we want >> to do >> it, then it's fine :) >> >> I was just pointing out that "circular dependency" is not an issue >> :) :) >> >> -- dims >> >> On 1/30/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 13:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> > > I've reviewed the code in question, there are exactly 2 files in >> > > policy project that uses axiom namely >> > > >> > > - OMPolicyReader : OMPolicyReader is loaded on demand (using a >> class >> > > loader) from PolicyFactory.java. So moving it to axis2 core >> should not >> > > be a problem. >> > > - PolicyAttachmentUtil : PolicyAttachmentUtil is not even >> referenced >> > > from any other files in policy project. So there should not be a >> > > problem moving it to axis2 core. >> > > >> > > So, we don't have to do this right now. IMHO, We can defer this >> > > surgery for later. >> > >> > But this is the wrong thing to do from the point of view of the >> policy >> > model project. >> > >> > What's the reason for deferring the surgery? Its a relatively >> minor >> > surgery; easily outpatient care! ;-) >> > >> > Sanjiva. >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Paul Fremantle >> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair >> >> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle >> <http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com >> <http://www.wso2.com> > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
