Hi, I'm thinking of Buffering the stream containing the SOAP envelope only when someone actually refering to the attachment..
> While that's interesting in theory, whoever sent the attachment more > often than not expected the other end to read the darn thing. I don't > see the point of that potential optimization. Maybe I'm missing > something. I'm also feel like this is over engineering and not sure whether it'll become a overhead rather than a optimisation. IMO we need to have some serious discussions in the maling list before doing something like that..That's the very reason this is avoided in the initial impl. Most suitable usecase in here will be the intermediaries, which normally do not read the attachments.. Interesting figure in here will be the number of usecases where people actually use attchments with intermediaries.. ~Thilina > > -- "May the SourcE be with u" http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina
