Looking XFire and Celtix binary distribution, I think they use SUN's SAAJ impl directly. They does not seem to implement their own SAAJ as we do in Axis1 and Axis2.
On 5/25/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Q: "Does Axis1 treat its SAAJ impl differently from pure SAAJ"? A: YES. No clue about how others are doing it. -- dims On 5/24/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 08:03 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Sanjiva, > > > > Problem that jongjin is referring to is that when you drop our Axis2 > > saaj impl into Axis1, it will blow up. > > I'm prolly being thick but why? "Drop our Axis2 SAAJ impl into Axis1" > must imply that the person dropping it did the work to integrate it via > the right factory and so forth .. and in that case its not obvious to me > why it should fail. Does Axis1 treat its SAAJ impl differently from pure > SAAJ?? > > Anyway this conversation seems to be moot: If JAX-RPC requires the old > pre-DOM SAAJ per Nick's message then we are indeed doomed (not DOOMed .. > which would of course imply that we're using the DOOM SAAJ). We can of > course impl the old SAAJ stuff using (DO)OM underneath too. > > I wonder how XFire and Celtix deal with this issue- do either of them > support JAX-RPC and JAX-WS simultaneously? > > Sanjiva. > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
