On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 13:49 +0530, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote: > Hi dims; > This is what we have right now , I mean one can implement Service > interface or just have session related method in the service impl class. > - if he has implement the interface , then we check the instance of the > service impl class , then call method accordingly > - else we check to see whether those method are there in the service > impl class , and if there are there we call them using java reflection. > > So I am +1 to have that.
I didn't realize that this is the behavior we have now. What's the purpose of having the interface if we don't require people to implement it? IMO that makes no sense. Either do the interface or don't. Doing both is hacky. [Are there any other well-known systems which have this dual mode behavior? Maybe that'll help convince me. Otherwise I'm against keeping both. (I'll refrain from using negative numbers for now ;-)).] Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
