On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:54 +0530, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> Seems good , but make unnecessary complication. Right now if I fixed a
> bug it takes about 40 mins to run the build , but after this I have to
> spent more than an hour (need to run two separate builds). Do you think
> this is a good idea ?..
> 
> I never agree to have branches , since I knew it going to be difficult
> task for developers. Even in last Axis2 realsae (Axis2 1.0) we didnt do
> a branch and we did that after we done the release.
> 
> *I think we need to reconsider this .*
> 
> P:S- remember what happen if someone commit while I am running my build
> , then I need to run the build again.

No solution is perfect; we can't keen an indefinite lock on others'
progress while the 1.1 release is done. There's been a virtual code
freeze now for few weeks .. we just can't do that for so long.

Let's be realistic- not every patch will likely make it to trunk right
now. We'll all have to have some painful time after the release to sync
the trees. 

Sanjiva.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to