Hi, Does this mean we would be shipping a Jetty based HTTP server (adding a Jetty dependancy )
Ajith On 10/9/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Srinath, I personally think it's a good move. Regards, Rajith On 10/9/06, Brian De Pradine <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > +1 from me. > > Cheers > > Brian DePradine > Web Services Development > IBM Hursley > External +44 (0) 1962 816319 Internal 246319 > > If you can't find the time to do it right the first time, where will you find the time to do it again? > > > "Jaliya Ekanayake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/10/2006 15:20:49: > > > > Hi All, > > > > One other advantage is that we can simply give an Axis2 server for the user > > as well. > > All they want is to start the Axis2 server which is based on Jetty. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jaliya > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Srinath Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org> > > Cc: "Thilina Gunarathne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jaliya Ekanayake" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 7:56 AM > > Subject: [Axis2]Embdeding Jetty to Axis2 > > > > > > > Hi All; > > > Myself and jaliya were talking about trying to do lot of async > > > requests using Axis2 client .. it falis at about 40-50 requests and we > > > belive that is becouse ..simple HTTP server can't handle the load. > > > > > > I was looking at the jetty and found out that Jetty6 allow you to > > > embed it to the application tightly. For an example > > > > > > Server server = new Server(8080); > > > Context root = new Context(server,"/",Context.SESSIONS); > > > root.addServlet(new ServletHolder(new HelloServlet(serviceMap)), "/*"); > > > server.start(); > > > > > > Will create a new server and add a servlet. > > > > > > I belive if we embdeded Jetty to Axis2 > > > 1) Axis2 can use jetty as the listener for async messages > > > 2) Axis2 can started up standalone using jetty > > > > > > I belive I could port our Axis2 servlet to jetty pretty easily. > > > > > > If people agree I think we should have it as a module and if it is > > > sucessful I think we should switch to it as our default container some > > > day > > > > > > thoughts? > > > Srinath > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ============================ > > > Srinath Perera: > > > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ > > > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
-- Ajith Ranabahu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
